Trump Instituting a New Refugee Restart

President Donald Trump is restarting the nation’s expensive policy of transplanting foreign refugees into towns and cities around the nation, following a 12o-day pause for the development of new security provisions.

Trump’s decision comes after he reduced the annual inflow of refugees from more than 100,000 down to 45,000. Conservative hoped for a deeper reform and a greater focus on aid to refugees in their homelands, but the cut is popular, and it caused an outcry from progressives, the taxpayer-funded groups that care for the refugees, and from the meatpacking and dairy industries which employ many of the new and usually unskilled refugees.

The restart decision comes after three security officials provided their recommendations to Trump.

The new security provisions include an intensive review of refugees from 11 unnamed nations, according to a statement from the Department of Homeland Security. The statement said that officials:

concluded that additional in-depth review is needed with respect to refugees from 11 countries previously identified as posing a higher risk to the United States. Consequently, admissions for applicants from those 11 high-risk countries will move forward on a case-by-case basis during an additional 90-day review period, consistent with our national security interests. As DHS, State and DNI complete individual country reviews, they may resume a standard admissions process for applicants from those countries.

Officials will also begin security reviews of the chain-migrants who are being invited into the United States by approved refugees. The agency recommendations said:

Based on an assessment of current systems checks, as well as requirements for uniformity identified by Section 5, we will direct our staffs to work jointly to implement adequate screening mechanisms for following-to-join refugees that are similar to the processes employed for principal refugees, in order to ensure the security and welfare of the United States. We will resume admission of following-to-join refugees once those enhancements have been implemented.

In a late afternoon phone call with reporters, officials declined to explain the new security procedures. For example, one official said the checks on immigrants from the 11 countries would be ”using a totality of the circumstances regarding the applicant’s overall credibility.”

Another official insisted the agencies would not “discriminate” when he was asked to explain what characteristics would cause officials to exclude particular refugees. The official declined to describe what characteristics would cause officials to accept some refugees and to reject others.

DHS acting chief Elaine Duke offered a similarly vague explanation, saying:

The security of the American people is this administration’s highest priority, and these improved vetting measures are essential for American security. These new, standardized screening measures provide an opportunity for the United States to welcome those in need into our country, while ensuring a safer, more secure homeland.

This evasiveness may be forced by the government lawyers who protecting Trump’s policies from progressive judges, several of whom now insist they have the power to admit immigrants and refugees despite opposition from the elected president.

Agency opposition to Trump’s policies has also been strong. In September, the federal officials who run the nation’s immigration agencies claimed that they are clearing $630 million a year in extra taxes for the federal government by importing the low-skill refugees for jobs that would otherwise be done by sidelined Americans or be automated by American-built technology.

That study was slammed by critics for hiding the multi-billion-dollar costs of recent immigrants, many of whom are uneducated, unskilled and unlikely to assimilate into the United States’s culture.


  • Keith

    “That study was slammed by critics for hiding the multi-billion-dollar
    costs of recent immigrants, many of whom are uneducated, unskilled and
    unlikely to assimilate into the United States culture.” We already have more than enough uneducated people that can’t even feed themselves without crime and welfare. More are NOT required. Especially Muslims that have only one aim, to see us all dead. Why after 215 years of fighting Islam don’t our government overlords have this figured out?????

    • ADBDAB

      They are stupid.

    • regulus30

      notice our problem is also with blacks.

  • Ischgabibble

    Best way to handle this problem is to arm these people and send them home to fight their own fights not bring them here and pay for them the rest of our lives.



  • kbfallon

    Charity begins at HOME ……help them right where they are…’s proven that the money we spend on one of them here could help at least six of them there…and then we won’t have to deal with them not or won’t assimilating. The ones we help here should have a set amount of time receiving money from the taxpayers and if not—send them back to their homeland…I believe that is a law but is it enforced?

  • rick meek

    Leave them where they are – their countries need to be rebuilt…..